Excuse and Try are not in our dictionary.

Cloud Migration Strategies: Lift and Shift vs. Re-architecting

In today’s digital landscape, businesses are increasingly adopting cloud computing to enhance their operational efficiency, scalability, and overall agility. However, the process of migrating existing applications to the cloud requires careful planning and consideration. Two primary approaches to cloud migration are often discussed: “Lift and Shift” and “Re-architecting.” Each strategy has its own advantages and challenges, and the choice between them depends on various factors specific to the organization’s goals and existing infrastructure.

Lift and Shift

The Lift and Shift approach, also known as “rehosting,” involves moving applications from on-premises environments to the cloud with minimal modifications. Essentially, it entails replicating the existing architecture and components in the cloud infrastructure. This method can be relatively quicker and less complex compared to re-architecting. It’s suitable for applications that need to be migrated swiftly and where immediate benefits like improved scalability or cost savings are the primary objectives.

Advantages of Lift and Shift

Faster Migration

Since the core architecture remains unchanged, the migration process is typically faster.

Minimal Disruption

Existing applications can continue running without significant changes, minimizing disruptions to the business.

Cost Efficiency

While not fully optimized for the cloud, Lift and Shift can still result in some cost savings due to scalability benefits.

Challenges of Lift and Shift

Missed Cloud-native Benefits

Applications may not fully utilize cloud-native features, limiting potential benefits like auto-scaling and elasticity.

Limited Optimization

Performance improvements might not be significant, as the application wasn’t designed with cloud-specific optimizations in mind.

Technical Debt

The migrated application may accumulate technical debt, potentially requiring future re-architecting to fully leverage cloud capabilities.


Re-architecting involves redesigning and modifying applications to fully leverage the benefits of cloud-native environments. This approach requires more time and effort but can result in optimized performance, enhanced scalability, and better cost management.

Advantages of Re-architecting

Cloud-native Optimization

Applications are designed specifically for the cloud, capitalizing on features like microservices, containers, and serverless computing.

Scalability and Performance

Re-architected applications can efficiently scale up or down based on demand, improving overall performance and user experience.

Long-term Benefits

Investing in re-architecting can yield greater long-term benefits, reducing technical debt and minimizing the need for future major overhauls.

Challenges of Re-architecting

Resource Intensive

Re-architecting requires significant time, expertise, and resources to design, develop, and test the new architecture.


The process can disrupt ongoing operations, potentially causing downtime or reduced functionality during migration.

Learning Curve

Teams may need to acquire new skills and knowledge to work effectively with cloud-native technologies.

Choosing the Right Strategy

The decision between Lift and Shift and Re-architecting depends on factors such as the complexity of the application, timeline for migration, business goals, and available resources. Organizations often find that a hybrid approach, combining elements of both strategies, best meets their needs.
In conclusion, cloud migration is a critical step for organizations seeking to harness the power of cloud computing. Both Lift and Shift and Re-architecting have their merits, and the choice should be based on a thorough analysis of the specific requirements and objectives of the business. With careful planning and the right strategy, a successful cloud migration can pave the way for improved efficiency, innovation, and growth.